Analisis Kegagalan Battery P/N 2758 dengan Menggunakan Metode RCM pada Pesawat Airbus 320 di PT XYZ

Authors

  • Fadel Rachmat Hidayat Politeknik Penerbangan Indonesia Curug
  • Lilies Esthi Riyanti Politeknik Penerbangan Indonesia Curug
  • Muhammad Faridh Al Farisy Politeknik Penerbangan Indonesia Curug

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/teknik.v6i1.8662

Keywords:

Battery, Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM)

Abstract

The Battery component on the Airbus 320 plays an important role in the aircraft’s electrical system, especially when the aircraft is on the ground, during the start process of the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU), and in emergency conditions. Battery P/N 2758 is categorized as a NO GO item, meaning that if it fails, the aircraft is not permitted to fly. This component is a hard time component with a specific service life limit. Based on PT XYZ data, there were 184 cases of component removal within one year, indicating a high failure frequency before the end of its service life, which increases maintenance costs and disrupts flight schedules. This study analyzes the causes of Battery P/N 2758 failures and determines maintenance strategies using the Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) method with Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) approaches. The FMEA results identify four failure modes: Low Voltage, Battery Weak, Battery Drop, and Low Insulation, with Low Voltage having the highest RPN value of 192. FTA identifies three main causes: human error, improper work procedures, and environmental conditions. The recommended RCM strategies include Scheduled On-Condition Task and Failure Finding Task, with preventive actions such as voltage inspection, cleanliness maintenance, and proper storage temperature. This approach effectively minimizes failures by improving procedural discipline and regular inspections.

References

Airbus. (2021). A320 family: Technical information manual. Airbus SAS.

Alaslan, A. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Alijoyo, A., Wijaya, Q. B., & Jacob, I. (2020). Failure mode effect analysis: Analisis modus kegagalan dan dampak risk evaluation risk analysis: Consequences probability level of risk. CRMS, 19.

Federal Aviation Administration. (2018). Aviation maintenance technician handbook – Airframe (Vol. 31B). General: Amazon Digital Services LLC.

Prayoga, D. A., Achmadi, F., & Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya. (2022). Analisa komponen kritis dan penerapan reliability centered maintenance II (RCM II) (Studi kasus: Gas turbine compressor (GTC) pada fasilitas eksplorasi dan produksi lepas pantai PT X) [Tugas akhir, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya].

Rachman, A., Adianto, H., & Liansari, G. P. (2016). Perbaikan kualitas produk ubin semen menggunakan metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis dan Failure Tree Analysis di Institusi Keramik. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 4(1), 1–8.

Shevilia, A. E. (2023). Kajian maintenance pesawat penumpang di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknik SILITEK, 3(1), 12–19.

Stamatelatos, M., Caraballo, M. J., Vesely, W., Dugan, J., Fragola, M. J., Minarick, M. J., Railsback, M. J., & NASA Johnson Space Center. (2002). Fault tree handbook with aerospace applications. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerbangan. (2009). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 1.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

Fadel Rachmat Hidayat, Lilies Esthi Riyanti, & Muhammad Faridh Al Farisy. (2026). Analisis Kegagalan Battery P/N 2758 dengan Menggunakan Metode RCM pada Pesawat Airbus 320 di PT XYZ. Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro Dan Ilmu Komputer, 6(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.55606/teknik.v6i1.8662

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.