From Compliance to Commitment: Mapping Teachers’ Cognitive and Emotional Responses to Curriculum Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurdikbud.v6i1.10898Keywords:
Cognitive Response, Curriculum Reform, Emotional Response, Professional Commitment, Teacher BeliefsAbstract
This study examines educators' cognitive and emotional reactions to curriculum change via a Delphi-based Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with vice principals of senior secondary schools (SLTA level) in Aceh Tengah and Bener Meriah, Indonesia. Despite structural innovations in Indonesia's curriculum reform, including the Merdeka Curriculum and the Deep Learning method, implementation gaps remain at the school level. This study seeks to delineate how educators cognitively comprehend curriculum modifications and emotionally respond to their requirements, and how these reactions affect their commitment to implementation. Data were gathered through organized group discussions and reflective responses in a Delphi panel session, employing a qualitative descriptive methodology. The findings indicate two predominant cognitive orientations: (1) progressive acceptance, perceiving reform as essential and forward-looking, and (2) interpretative ambiguity, signifying challenges in implementing policy within classroom settings. Teachers exhibited a range of emotions, from optimism and a sense of professional vocation to exhaustion, administrative overload, and resistance stemming from established attitudes. The shift from compliance to commitment was significantly shaped by educators' fundamental values, introspective abilities, collaborative environment, and perceived institutional backing. The study presents a belief-centered transformation paradigm that incorporates cognitive clarity, emotional resilience, and professional learning communities as strategic mechanisms for enduring curriculum improvement. These findings enhance the discussion of teacher beliefs as a vital aspect of educational development in emerging areas.
References
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601555
Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading policy in practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
Datnow, A. (2020). The role of teachers in educational reform: A 20-year perspective. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20909110
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Teachers and Teaching, 13(4), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701391964
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9198-5
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hargreaves, A. (2001). Emotional geographies of teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1056–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00142
Hargreaves, A. (2018). The emotional politics of teaching and teacher development. Teachers and Teaching, 24(7), 835–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1483910
Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.009
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
Liu, K., & Fisher, R. (2022). Curriculum reform and teacher agency: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 12(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030155
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.812197
Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Harvard University Press.
Suryaman, M. (2020). Orientation of curriculum development in the 21st century. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.30241
Van Veen, K., Sleegers, P., & Van de Ven, P. (2005). One teacher’s identity, emotions, and commitment to change: A case study into the cognitive-affective processes of a secondary school teacher in the context of reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.004
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on professional learning communities: What do we know? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.
Zembylas, M. (2015). Emotion and trauma in teaching: Embodiment, pedagogy, and social justice. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
