Pengaruh Presepsi dan Efektifitas Pembelajaran LMS Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Motivasi Belajar

Rizeki Dyahmeirina; Yohanes Suhari

doi:10.55606/jaemb.v5i3.7842

Authors

Rizeki Dyahmeirina Universitas Stikubank Semarang
Yohanes Suhari Universitas Stikubank Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jaemb.v5i3.7842

Keywords:

Perception, LMS Effectiveness, Learning Motivation, Learning Outcomes, Path

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how student perceptions and the effectiveness of the use of a Learning Management System (LMS) influence learning outcomes, with learning motivation as a mediating variable. The approach used was quantitative with an explanatory method. The study involved 125 students of the Accounting Study Program in Semarang City who were selected using a purposive sampling technique. Data collection was carried out through a structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale, then the data were processed with validity tests, reliability tests, classical assumption tests, path analysis, and mediation tests with the Sobel test using SPSS version 25.0. The results of the analysis showed that both student perceptions and LMS effectiveness had a positive and significant effect on learning motivation. Meanwhile, student perceptions were not found to have a significant effect on learning outcomes, while LMS effectiveness was shown to have a positive and significant effect. Furthermore, learning motivation played a role as a significant mediating variable in the relationship between perceptions and LMS effectiveness with student learning outcomes. Overall, the results of the study indicate that positive student perceptions of LMS and LMS effectiveness in learning can increase learning motivation, which ultimately can support the achievement of better learning outcomes.

References

[1] N. Anggraini, “Efektivitas sistem daring dalam proses pembelajaran,” Jurnal Biologi Edukasi, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 33–44, 2022.

[2] W. Al Habsyi, “Persepsi pembelajaran daring dan dampaknya terhadap hasil belajar,” Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–68, 2023.

[3] A. Azis and N. Nurmayanti, “Persepsi siswa pada proses pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi Covid-19 terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa Madrasah Aliyah,” Supermat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 18–34, 2022.

[4] D. Gustan et al., “Pengaruh persepsi LMS terhadap motivasi belajar siswa,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 134–145, 2021.

[5] I. Plinggi and R. Tambunan, “Efektivitas LMS dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa,” Jurnal Pendidikan Digital, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2021.

[6] Teni and A. Yudianto, “Motivasi belajar dan pengaruhnya terhadap hasil belajar siswa,” Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 88–102, 2021.

[7] D. S. Cahyaningsih, “Using of the Learning Management System on Motivation and Learning Outcomes,” Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 152–161, 2022.

[8] E. P. Adi et al., “Effectiveness of Learning Management System of Universitas Negeri Malang in supporting distance learning,” Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 183–197, 2024.

[9] M. Al-Nasa’h et al., “Pengaruh Learning Management System terhadap motivasi dan tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa pada masa pandemik COVID-19,” JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2023.

[10] A. Nawanda and J. Tambotoh, “Evaluating the Success of Learning Management Systems using the EESS Model,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 337–352, 2024.

[11] R. Abdullatif, “Students’ Perception and Learning Motivation in the Implementation of E-learning Based on Moodle LMS,” Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 253–262, 2020.

[12] P. Springer and R. Smith, “Motivational Factors in the Use of LMS,” in Proc. Int. Conf. E-Learning, 2018, pp. 305–314.

[13] C. P. A. Abaricia and M. L. C. Delos Santos, “Enhancing E-Learning System Through LMS Technologies,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 563–570, 2023.

[14] A. A. Assaf, “The efficiency of the ‘Learning Management System (LMS)’ as a tool for e-learning,” International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 157–169, 2013.

[15] A. Revythi and N. Tselios, “Extension of Technology Acceptance Model using System Usability Scale,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2947–2969, 2017.

[16] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.

[17] D. R. Garrison, T. Anderson, and W. Archer, “Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 2–3, pp. 87–105, 2000.

[18] R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1173–1182, 1986.

[19] M. E. Sobel, “Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models,” Sociological Methodology, vol. 13, pp. 290–312, 1982.

[20] K. J. Preacher and A. F. Hayes, “SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 717–731, 2004.

[21] IBM Corp., IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., 2017.

[22] H. S. Fiock, “Designing a Community of Inquiry in Online Courses,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 135–153, Jan. 2020.

[23] A. G. Almekhlafi, H. A. Abdelaziz, and M. S. Shabaan, “Re-engineering the pedagogical design of virtual classrooms in higher education using the Community of Inquiry Framework,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 94–112, 2024.

[24] “The Community of Inquiry Framework in Online English Learning: Insights from Indonesia,” LLT Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 12–26, 2024.

[25] “Motivational theories in education: An integrative framework,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 35, pp. 455–478, 2023.