Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Skeptisme Profesional, Indepedensi, Tekanan Waktu dan Beban Kerja Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan
Studi Empiris Akuntan Publik Kota Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jimek.v5i3.8009Keywords:
Independence, Professional Skepticism, Time Pressure, Work Experience, WorkloadAbstract
This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of several individual and situational factors on the auditor’s ability to detect fraud, which is an essential competence in maintaining the integrity of financial reporting. The variables observed in this research include work experience, professional skepticism, independence, time pressure, and workload. The study was conducted in Jakarta and involved auditors working at Public Accounting Firms (KAP) across the city. Using a quantitative approach, the research employed a survey method with a total sample of 240 auditors who were selected as respondents. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and then analyzed using multiple linear regression, with statistical processing carried out using SPSS version 26. The findings of this study indicate that four variables—work experience, professional skepticism, independence, and time pressure—have a positive and significant influence on the auditor’s ability to detect fraud. This suggests that auditors who possess greater professional experience, a high level of skepticism, and strong independence are more capable of identifying fraud, even under conditions of time pressure. Interestingly, time pressure, which is often considered a constraint in auditing, was found to enhance fraud detection ability, possibly because it drives auditors to focus and prioritize critical aspects of their tasks. In contrast, the workload variable did not show a significant impact, indicating that the number of tasks or assignments alone may not reduce or improve an auditor’s effectiveness in detecting fraud. Overall, the study contributes to the understanding of the factors that shape auditors’ effectiveness in detecting fraudulent activities. The results emphasize the importance of enhancing auditor competence through continuous training and professional development, fostering independence in decision-making, and maintaining an optimal balance in task allocation.
References
Laitupa, M. F., & Hehanussa, H. (2020). Pengaruh pengalaman kerja, skeptisme profesional dan tekanan waktu terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(1), 1–22.
Madjid, Z. (2023, Juni 6). Diduga manipulasi laporan keuangan, akuntan publik Waskita bermasalah. Katadata.co.id. https://katadata.co.id
Mahsitah, I. S., & Mahmudi. (2021). Pengaruh sikap auditor, pengalaman audit investigatif, whistleblowing dan gender terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi fraud. Proceeding of National Conference on Accounting & Finance, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.20885/ncaf.vol3.art19
Munandar, A. S. (2014). Psikologi industri dan organisasi. UI Press.
Nirmala, A., & Cahyonowati, N. (2013). Pengaruh independensi, pengalaman, due professional care dan akuntabilitas terhadap kualitas audit. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2(4), 1–12.
Nurwahyuni, & Isniawati, A. (2021). Analisis faktor-faktor kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan dengan moderasi etika profesi. Journal of Business and Information Systems, 3(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v3i2.102
Primasatya, A. M., Kalangi, L., & Gamaliel, H. (2022). Pengaruh moral reasoning, pengalaman kerja dan beban kerja terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing “GOODWILL”, 13(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.35800/jjs.v13i1.39674
Sandi, F. (2024, Mei 25). Audit KAP Lapkeu Indofarma temukan fraud & kerugian Rp 371 M. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20240525104850-17-541028/audit-kap-lapkeu-indofarma-temukan-fraud-kerugian-rp-371-m
Shaleh, M., Rahmawati, I., & Yuliana, D. (2024). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional, independensi, dan beban kerja terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 28(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol28.iss1.art4
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D (Cet. ke-3). Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.