Juridical Analysis of Non-Effective Taxpayer Determination Disputes: Study of Tax Court Ruling Number 009544.99/2020/Pp/M.Ib 2020 and The Ruling of The Supreme Court Number 4910/B/Pk/Pjk/2022

Authors

  • Seger Santoso Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
  • M. Reza Saputra Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
  • Ngadi Permana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
  • M. Farel Deniyu Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
  • Citra Sulthanah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/optimal.v2i4.4462

Keywords:

Non-Effective Taxpayer, Tax Dispute, Tax Court, Supreme Court, Legal Certainty, Tax Administration

Abstract

This study analyzes the resolution of disputes regarding the determination of non-effective taxpayers through a case study of the Tax Court Decision Number 009544.99/2020/PP/MIB of 2020 and the Supreme Court Decision Reg. Number 4910/B/PK/Pjk/2022 of 2022. Tax is a crucial source of state revenue, and uncertainty in the status of non-effective taxpayers can significantly impact the effectiveness of tax administration and state revenue. This research employs a normative legal approach, with an in-depth analysis of relevant legal documents, tax regulations, and the legal considerations taken by the judges. The findings indicate that the Supreme Court rejected the petition for judicial review submitted by the Directorate General of Taxes and upheld the Tax Court's decision that annulled the business turnover correction amounting to IDR 270,659,270,000, stating that Mrs Sri Roosmini is entitled to be designated as a non-effective taxpayer as she has met the stipulated requirements. The judges' considerations are based on justice and legal certainty, prioritizing substance over administrative formalities. This ruling underscores the importance of harmonizing tax obligations with taxpayers' rights while encouraging tax authorities to be more meticulous in evaluating non-effective taxpayer status applications, which is expected to enhance voluntary tax compliance. This study also offers recommendations for improving tax administration procedures in the future.

References

Amiruddin, Azwar, A. Muin Fahmal, and Agussalim A. Gadjong. "Policy Regulations (Beleidsregel) and Discourse in Tax Audits at the Tax Court of the Republic of Indonesia: Study of Tax Disputes Number: 01033399/2020/PP at the Tax Court of the Republic of Indonesia." Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) 3.5 (2022): 974-992.

Brotodihardjo, R. S. Introduction to Tax Law. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2008.

Damayanti, Wulan, et al. "Value Added Tax on Notaries Who Are Taxable Entrepreneurs." Justice 11.3 (2024): 21-29.

Djafar Saidi, Muhammad. Taxpayer Legal Protection in Tax Dispute Resolution. Jakarta: Radja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Hidayat, Muhammad. "TUN Judicial Decision at Appeal Level and Judicial Review Level (PK) Sukarami Jaya Village Election Dispute from the Perspective of Beschikking Judicial Control." Hutanasyah: Journal of Constitutional Law 2.1 (2023): 1-16.

Hutabarat, Slina Kartika. Settlement of Article 16D Value Added Tax Disputes in the Tax Court (Case Study of PT CitraMasjaya TekniMandiri). Thesis. Indonesian Christian University, 2022.

Jordi, Mario Jon. "Regulation and Challenges of Implementing the Substance Over Form Doctrine as a General Anti-Avoidance Rule in Preventing Tax Avoidance Practices in Indonesia." Jurnal Law and Taxation 1.1 (2023): 125-176.

Pandiangan, Liberti. Modernization & Reform of Tax Services. Elex Media Komputindo, 2013.

Mardiasmo. Taxation. Jakarta: Andi Yogyakarta, 2011.

Murdani, Beni. Tax & Legal Certainty (Philosophical, Theoretical, Practical) Legal Approach, Case Approach, Legal Interpretation & Economic Analysis of Law. Nas Media Library, 2024.

Said, Muhtar, and Erfandi Erfandi. "Judge's Interpretation of Judex Facti and Judex Juris Regarding the Maximum Limit of Administrative Efforts." Progressive: Law Journal 17.1 (2023): 1-23.

Saputra, M. Reza, and Wicipto Setiadi. "Implementation Of General Principles Of Good Government In The Organization Of The 2024 Elections." International Journal of Law and Society 1.3 (2024): 94-112.

Saputra, M. Reza, and Taufiqurrohman Syahuri. "Analisis Dampak Revisi UU Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Independensi Hakim Di Indonesia." Jembatan Hukum: Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara 1.3 (2024): 80-89.

Saputra, M. Reza, and Wicipto Setiadi. "Analisis Potensi Implementasi Sistem Politik Tanpa Partai di Indonesia dan Dampaknya terhadap Demokrasi dan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan." Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara 2.4 (2024): 204-222.

Suharsono, Agus. "Legal Construction of Supreme Court Judges in Deciding Coal Company Value Added Tax Disputes (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number: 36/B/PK/PJK/2016)." Scientific Journal of Law and Community Dynamics 20.1 (2022): 34-45.

Suwasta, Asep Dedi, and Ujuh Juhana. Introduction to Legal Science, Tohar Media, 2024.

Triwiraputra, Ega Laksmana, Beniharmoni Harefa, and Handoyo Prasetyo. "Reformulation of the Loan of Evidence Materials in the Preliminary Evidence Process to Provide Legal Certainty for Taxpayers." USM Law Review Journal 7.2 (2024): 740-756.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Seger Santoso, M. Reza Saputra, Ngadi Permana, M. Farel Deniyu, & Citra Sulthanah. (2022). Juridical Analysis of Non-Effective Taxpayer Determination Disputes: Study of Tax Court Ruling Number 009544.99/2020/Pp/M.Ib 2020 and The Ruling of The Supreme Court Number 4910/B/Pk/Pjk/2022. OPTIMAL Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 2(4), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.55606/optimal.v2i4.4462