Perbandingan Metode Pengumpulan Data dalam Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Serta Aplikasinya dalam Penelitian Akuntansi Interpretatif

Authors

  • Seger Santoso STIE Kasih Bangsa
  • Eri Kusnanto STIE Kasih Bangsa
  • M. Reza Saputra STIE Kasih Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/optimal.v2i3.4457

Keywords:

Data Collection Methods, Qualitative Research, Quantitative Research, Interpretive Accounting, Research Paradigm

Abstract

This research examines the differences in data collection methods between qualitative and quantitative research and their applications in interpretive accounting research. The research aims to analyze and compare the characteristics of data collection methods between qualitative and quantitative approaches and to identify their implementation in the context of interpretive accounting research. The research method uses a literature study approach by analyzing various reference sources related to research methodology. The results show that quantitative research relies on structured instruments such as questionnaires and surveys to generate numerical data, while qualitative research positions the researcher as the main instrument using methods such as in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis. In the context of interpretive accounting research, qualitative approaches are more dominantly used due to their ability to uncover deep meaning and interpretation of accounting phenomena. This research concludes that the selection of data collection methods must be aligned with the research paradigm, research objectives, and characteristics of the problems being studied.

References

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms And Organisational Analysis: Elements Of The Sociology Of Corporate Life. Routledge.

Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical Developments In Accounting Thought. Accounting review, 601-632.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Djasuli, M. (2017). Paradigma Interpretif Pada Riset Akuntansi (Sebuah Opini: Peneliti Pemula Tidak Terjebak Dalam Penelitian Minimalis Akuntansi). Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 10(2), 97-106.

Fern, E. F. (1982). The use of focus groups for idea generation: the effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of marketing Research, 19(1), 1-13.

Frödén, S., & Tellgren, B. (2024). Guiding children towards individual and collective growth. Educative participatory experiences in a preschool setting. International Journal of Early Years Education, 32(2), 334-348.

Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.

Kusmarni, Y. (2012). Studi Kasus. UGM Jurnal Edu UGM Press.

Rehman, A. A., & Alharthi, K. (2016). An introduction to research paradigms. International journal of educational investigations, 3(8), 51-59.

Saputra, M. R., & Setiadi, W. (2024). Implementation Of General Principles Of Good Government In The Organization Of The 2024 Elections. International Journal of Law and Society, 1(3), 94-112.

Saputra, M. R. (2024). Sistem Politik Tanpa Partai di Indonesia: Tantangan, Peluang, dan Dampaknya Terhadap Demokrasi. Jurnal Lanskap Politik, 2(2), 77-105.

Saputra, M. R., & Setiadi, W. (2024). Analisis Potensi Implementasi Sistem Politik Tanpa Partai di Indonesia dan Dampaknya terhadap Demokrasi dan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 2(4), 204-222.

Sarantakos, S. (1994). Trial Cohabitation On Trial. Australian Social Work, 47(3), 13-25.

Sukoharsono, E. G. (2006). Alternatif Riset Kualitatif Sains Akuntansi: Biografi, Phenomenologi, Grounded Theory, Critical Ethnografi dan Case Study. Dipublikasikan di Analisa Makro dan Mikro: Jembatan Kebijakan Ekonomi Indonesia. Editor: Khusnur Ashar, Gugus Irianto dan Nanang Suryadi. Hal, 230-245.

Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis, and management. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 68(3), 226.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Seger Santoso, Eri Kusnanto, & M. Reza Saputra. (2022). Perbandingan Metode Pengumpulan Data dalam Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Serta Aplikasinya dalam Penelitian Akuntansi Interpretatif. OPTIMAL Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 2(3), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.55606/optimal.v2i3.4457