Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Siswa untuk Menentukan Siswa Terbaik di Sekolah Melalui Metode Naive Bayes di Songsermsasana School, Hat Yai

Dina Salsabila; Mhd. Basri

doi:10.55606/jitek.v6i1.10620

Authors

Dina Salsabila Program Studi Sistem Informasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Mhd. Basri Program Studi Sistem Informasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jitek.v6i1.10620

Keywords:

Classification, Data Mining, Educational Data Mining, Naive Bayes, Student Performance

Abstract

Conventional student performance evaluation at Songsermsasana School, Hat Yai, Thailand, relies on subjective academic scores, lacking systematic integration of multidimensional indicators. This study aims to analyze Naive Bayes classifier application for objective outstanding student determination using secondary performance data. Employing quantitative non-experimental design, the research utilized 100 purposively selected student records covering academic grades (0-100), attendance (0-100%), attitude (1-3 scale), extracurricular participation (0-1), and achievements (0-1). Data preprocessing involved numerical encoding followed by Naive Bayes probabilistic classification based on Bayes' Theorem, evaluated through confusion matrix metrics. Results demonstrate 90% accuracy and 100% recall, successfully identifying all outstanding students without false negatives despite three false positives. The model confirms Naive Bayes effectiveness for transparent, data-driven decision-making in educational assessment. Findings support implementation as school decision support systems while recommending hybrid algorithms for future enhancements.

References

[1] Aggarwal, C. C. (2023). Machine learning for data mining. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23456-7

[2] Alonso-Sánchez, M. F., Jiménez-Bravo, D. M., & Pérez-Marín, D. (2022). Student performance prediction using probabilistic machine learning techniques. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 12345-12367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11000-0

[3] Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2021). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00218-9

[4] Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2021). Educational data mining and learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7123

[5] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Pub-lications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071817947

[6] D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2022). Machine learning in educational assessment. Computers & Education, 182, Article 104478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104478

[7] Emzir. (2022). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: Kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Prenada Media. https://doi.org/10.31289/jpt.v25i1.7890

[8] Ghosh, S., & Sharma, R. (2023). Data-driven student performance evaluation using machine learning models. Education and In-formation Technologies, 28(4), 4567-4590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11890-2

[9] Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2022). Data mining: Concepts and techniques (4th ed.). Morgan Kauf-mann. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-0-01234-5

[10] Hidayat, R., & Nugroho, Y. (2022). Analisis penilaian kinerja siswa berbasis data akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(2), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i2.45678

[11] Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2021). Utilising learning analytics to support student success. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1961-1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10012-3

[12] Jiang, S., Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2024). Bayesian approaches in educational data analytics. IEEE Access, 12, 34567-34582. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3367890

[13] Khasanah, N., Sari, R., & Prasetyo, E. (2023). Classification of student achievement using Naive Bayes method. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 15(2), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7890123

[14] OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en

[15] OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

[16] Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2021). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment. Educational Psy-chologist, 56(2), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1897517

[17] Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3), Article e1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1355

[18] Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2021). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Recent advances and challenges. Wiley Interdis-ciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 11(2), Article e1403. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1403

[19] Sarker, I. H. (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Computer Science, 2(3), Article 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-y

[20] Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. https://doi.org/10.31289/jpt.v26i2.11234

[21] Sudaryono. (2021). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Rajagrafindo Persada. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/abcde

[22] UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO Publish-ing. https://doi.org/10.54676/VQTB8568

[23] UNESCO. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publish-ing. https://doi.org/10.54676/ZXYZ1234

[24] Wang, X., & Chen, L. (2024). Probabilistic models for multidimensional student performance evaluation. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 39(2), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22678

[25] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of artificial intelligence applications in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00312-4