Internalisasi Green Human Capital dalam Membentuk Environmental Attitude Karyawan Generasi Z di Tempat Kerja

Authors

  • Randika Shafly Fawwaz Institut Karya Mulia Bangsa
  • Reni Nur Arifah Institut Karya Mulia Bangsa
  • Putri Aryo Jelang Fitri Institut Karya Mulia Bangsa
  • Yetty Yuliany Kusuma Ningrum Institut Karya Mulia Bangsa
  • Anindya Putri Utami Institut Karya Mulia Bangsa
  • Eva Fachria Institut Karya Mulia Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jimek.v6i2.10829

Keywords:

Environmental Attitude, Generation Z, Green Human Capital, Qualitative Research, Sustainability Practices

Abstract

This study examines the role of Green Human Capital in shaping environmental attitudes among Generation Z employees in sustainability-oriented organizations. As Generation Z increasingly dominates the workforce, environmental sustainability has become a strategic issue that companies need to address. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive-exploratory design, conducting in-depth interviews with ten Generation Z employees from sustainability-oriented organizations. Data analysis is performed using thematic analysis to identify factors influencing employees' environmental attitudes. The findings show that Green Human Capital plays a significant role in shaping positive environmental attitudes through the internalization of sustainability knowledge, the development of green competencies, and the instillation of sustainability values. Additionally, the consistency of policies and leadership role modeling has been shown to strengthen environmental attitudes. On the other hand, symbolic implementation that is inconsistent can weaken these attitudes. These findings provide valuable insights for companies in optimizing the role of Green Human Capital to enhance environmental attitudes among Generation Z employees.

References

Ahmed, U., Umrani, W. A., Qureshi, M. A., & Sarmad, M. (2022). Pathways towards sustainable performance: The role of green human resource management practices and green human capital. Journal of Cleaner Production, 351, 131498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131498

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

Baykal, E., & Bayraktar, S. (2022). Green human resources management: A novel tool to boost work engagement. Sustainability, 14(3), 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031449

Benítez-Márquez, M. D., Sánchez-Teba, E. M., & Cruz-Ruiz, E. (2022). Generation Z within the workforce and in the workplace: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 850011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850011

Carr, E. S. (2011). Qualifying the qualitative social work interview: A study of interactional practices. Qualitative Social Work, 10(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009359389

Chouhan, V. (2025). Linking green human resource management with employee pro-environmental behaviours: The role of green psychological climate and environmental concern. Management of Environmental Quality, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509251343433

Dwidienawati, D., Abdinagoro, S. B., Tjahjana, D., & Gandasari, D. (2021). Do Generation Y and Z really concern about environmental issues? Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 112995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112995

European Economic Letters. (2024). A comprehensive review of the literature on green human capital. European Economic Letters, 14(1), 45–61.

Garavan, T. N., Ullah, S., Carbery, R., & Rock, A. (2023). Employee perceptions of individual green HRM practices and voluntary green work behaviour. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12436

Knott, S., Rao, V., & Woolcock, M. (2022). Interviews in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 48, 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090221-021053

Legese, E. T., Zhou, L., & Zhang, Y. (2026). How green HRM enhances sustainable organizational performance: A capability-building explanation through green innovation and organizational culture. Business Strategy and the Environment, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3610

Li, Z., Abdu, M., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Does green human resource management stimulate employees' green behavior through a green psychological climate? Journal of Business Research, 172, 114114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114114

Lulewicz-Sas, A., Kinowska, H., & Wójcik, P. (2025). Examining the impacts of environmental, social and governance (ESG) on employee engagement: A study of Generation Z. Sustainability, 17(2), 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020612

Marič, M., Marinčič, M., & Ferjan, M. (2025). Insights into Gen Z values for affective human resource management. Personnel Review, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2024-0531

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Lancaster, G. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 18(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-10-2022-2224

Nguyen, T. M., Tho, N. D., & Hanh, T. T. (2025). Connecting green human resource management practices with employees' pro-environmental behaviours: The role of self-efficacy and psychological green climate. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2364517

Paulet, R., Holland, P., & Morgan, D. (2021). A meta-review of 10 years of green human resource management. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59(3), 476–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12285

Pontillo, P., Domínguez, J. M., & Ruiz, A. (2025). The mediating role of green human capital in the relationship between green human resource management practices and green employee behavior for a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 136942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.136942

Pramana, R., Hastjarjo, T. D., & Raharjo, S. T. (2021). Millennial and Gen Z perspective towards eco-office campaign implementation in public sector. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 716, 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012030

Renwick, D. W. S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Muller-Camen, M., Redman, T., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Contemporary developments in green (environmental) HRM scholarship. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1105844

Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Hafeez, S., Khan, I., Tahir, M., & Afridi, M. A. (2018). Promoting employees' pro-environmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1694

Sharif, A., & Malik, A. (2025). Does green human resource management and intellectual capital strengthen psychological green climate and green behaviors? Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.137335

Shoaib, M., Nawal, A., & Zaman, U. (2022). Modeling green HRM, green human capital, and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3198–3215. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3091

Toker, S. (2022). A guide for qualitative data analysis in social sciences. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-02-2021-0012

Ye, C., Liu, H., & Tan, J. (2023). Barriers to green human resources management implementation in developing countries. Sustainability, 15(6), 5204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065204

Downloads

Published

2026-04-22

How to Cite

Randika Shafly Fawwaz, Reni Nur Arifah, Putri Aryo Jelang Fitri, Yetty Yuliany Kusuma Ningrum, Anindya Putri Utami, & Eva Fachria. (2026). Internalisasi Green Human Capital dalam Membentuk Environmental Attitude Karyawan Generasi Z di Tempat Kerja. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 6(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.55606/jimek.v6i2.10829

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.