Analisis Yuridis atas Penghapusan PPh Final bagi Tenaga Kesehatan: Implikasi terhadap Akses dan Keadilan Pelayanan Kesehatan

Authors

  • Berlian Shinta Faradiansyah Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang
  • Muhammad Baharul Iman Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v6i1.9265

Keywords:

Final Income Tax, Health Services, Health Workers, Tax Policy, The Right Health

Abstract

The policy of eliminating the 0.5% Final Income Tax (PPh Final) scheme for health workers, particularly independent medical practitioners, has significantly affected the taxation framework in the health sector. This study aims to analyze the regulatory basis for the abolition of Final Income Tax, its juridical implications for fiscal justice, and its impact on healthcare accessibility, especially in remote areas. Using a juridical-normative method with conceptual and qualitative analysis, this research explores the link between fiscal policy and the protection of the right to health as guaranteed in Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The findings reveal that the elimination of the Final Income Tax without compensatory affirmative policies imposes a new administrative burden on health workers and potentially undermines the sustainability of independent healthcare services in underserved regions. Furthermore, this policy risks creating substantive fiscal inequality, conflicting with the principles of proportionality and social justice in the national tax system. Therefore, a more socially responsive fiscal regulation is needed to ensure that taxation does not hinder the equity and continuity of health service delivery.

 

References

Aji, I. P. (2020). Tijauan insentif PPh bagi sumber daya manusia di bidang kesehatan dalam masa pandemi virus Covid-19. Behavioral Accounting Journal, 3(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.33005/baj.v3i2.105

Bruce-Twum, E. (2023). SMEs tax compliance behaviour in emerging economies: Do tax compliance costs matter? Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, 24(2), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2023.v24n2p27

Choi, J. H., Choi, J. H., & Kleiman, A. J. (2024). Subjective costs of tax compliance. Minnesota Law Review, 108(3). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4345082

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2024). Partisipasi terakhir tarif setengah persen. https://www.pajak.go.id/index.php/id/artikel/partisipasi-terakhir-tarif-setengah-persen

Drummond, J. R., & Radaelli, C. M. (2024). Behavioural analysis and regulatory impact assessment. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 15, 950–965. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.1

Hutasoit, T. F., & Sewu, P. L. S. (2022). Asas lex specialis derogat legi generalis dikaitkan dengan asas lex superiori derogat legi inferiori dalam rekam medis elektronik di Indonesia. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i12.10907

International Monetary Fund & World Bank Group. (2015). Tax policy assessment framework. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/106141625812725457/pdf/Personal-Income-Tax.pdf

Laksono, A. D., Wulandari, R. D., Ipa, M., Sillehu, S., Megatsari, H., Senewe, F. P., Latifah, L., Ashar, H., Rohmah, N., Khoiri, A., & Purwoko, S. (2024). Pemanfaatan pelayanan kesehatan di daerah tertinggal, perbatasan, dan kepulauan (R. D. Wulandari, Ed.; 1st ed.). PERSAKMI.

Lazos, G., Pazarskis, M., & Karakitsiou, A. (2022). The tax compliance cost of businesses and its key determinants: Evidence from Greek businesses. Journal of Tax Administration, 7(1), 39–56.

Montel, L., Ssenyonga, N., Coleman, M. P., & Allemani, C. (2022). How should implementation of the human right to health be assessed? A scoping review of the public health literature from 2000 to 2021. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01742-0

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 113/PMK.03/2022 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 226/PMK.03/2021 tentang Pemberian Insentif Pajak terhadap Barang yang Diperlukan dalam Rangka Penanganan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 dan Perpanjangan Pemberlakuan Fasilitas Pajak Penghasilan bagi Sumber Daya Manusia di Bidang Kesehatan.

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 226/PMK.03/2021 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 9/PMK.03/2021 tentang Insentif Pajak untuk Wajib Pajak Terdampak Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2020 tentang Fasilitas Pajak Penghasilan dalam Rangka Penanganan Corona Virus Disease 2019.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 Tahun 2022 tentang Penyesuaian Pengaturan di Bidang Pajak Penghasilan.

Puspita, A. A., Maryanti, S. P., Wardani, A. R., Jasinta, I., & Stogmuller, K. (2025). A critical review of Indonesia’s health law and its implementing regulations: Strengths and challenges. South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22146/seajalgov.v2i1.19387

Richmiani, H. A. (2016). Antinomi investigasi dan pemeriksaan pajak: Suatu tinjauan atas prinsip-prinsip yuridis fiskal. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Saptono, P. B., Hodžić, S., Khozen, I., Mahmud, G., Pratiwi, I., Purwanto, D., Aditama, M. A., Haq, N., & Khodijah, S. (2023). Quality of e-tax system and tax compliance intention: The mediating role of user satisfaction. Informatics, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010022

Saptyana, R. F., & Marendra, R. (2022). Sosialisasi pentingnya pelaporan surat pemberitahuan tahunan (SPT) pajak di bidang kesehatan. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Politeknik Piksi Ganesha, 2(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.56689/padma.v2i2.789

Siswanto, S., Hendarwan, H., Kusumawardani, N., & Handayani, L. (2020). Bunga rampai kinerja pembangunan kesehatan di Indonesia: Tantangan, masalah, dan solusi (Vol. 1). Lembaga Penerbit Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. https://repository.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/id/eprint/4143/1/Buku%20Kinerja%20Pembangunan%20Kesehatan%20di%20Indonesia.pdf

Srivithaya, S. (2024). Regulatory impact assessment for law reform: A comparison of the parliament role. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 6(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv6i1p7

Susilawati, N., Djuhriah, A., & Zahro, R. A. (2024). Urgensi kebijakan prospektif pajak penghasilan final bagi dokter praktik mandiri: Tinjauan dari asas kemudahan administrasi. Sebatik, 28(1), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v28i1.2387

UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2000). General comment No. 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health (Article 12) (UN Doc. E/C.12/2000/4).

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 tentang Pajak Penghasilan.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan.

Yusriesa, D. S. A., Ditta, A. S. A., & Ditasari, R. A. (2023). Implementasi tax review atas perhitungan PPh Pasal 21 pada imbalan jasa dokter tenaga ahli pada PT SAY. Seminar Inovasi Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 5(13), 1–13.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-13

How to Cite

Berlian Shinta Faradiansyah, & Muhammad Baharul Iman. (2026). Analisis Yuridis atas Penghapusan PPh Final bagi Tenaga Kesehatan: Implikasi terhadap Akses dan Keadilan Pelayanan Kesehatan. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 6(1), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v6i1.9265