Perbandingan Pendekatan Pidana Restoratif dan Retributif dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Kejahatan di Indonesia secara Hukum dan Sosial

Authors

  • Sitti Munawwarah Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Tumian Lian Daya Purba Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Kaharuddin Syah Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu
  • Irsyad Sudirman Universitas Kaltara
  • Muhammad Aiman Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i4.7626

Keywords:

Case, Reconciliation, Restorative, Retributive, Victim Satisfaction

Abstract

This article discusses the comparison between restorative and retributive criminal justice systems in resolving criminal cases in Indonesia. The background of this study is the growing urgency to implement a more humanistic criminal justice model that not only focuses on punishment or retaliation, but also emphasizes efforts to restore the losses of victims and achieve reconciliation between perpetrators, victims, and the community. This study aims to analyze the fundamental differences between the two approaches, assess their effectiveness in the Indonesian context, and identify challenges in their implementation. A qualitative approach is applied through literature review and policy analysis by examining legal regulations, law enforcement practices, and implementation experiences across various judicial institutions. The findings reveal that the retributive justice system remains dominant, particularly in cases involving serious and violent crimes. However, the restorative justice model has been increasingly introduced in minor offenses and complaint-based cases, especially through mechanisms such as mediation and community involvement. Restorative justice is found to offer greater potential in reducing recidivism rates, increasing victim satisfaction, and promoting long-term social harmony. Despite its advantages, the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia still faces multiple challenges, including limited regulatory support, lack of public awareness, and resistance within legal institutions due to entrenched punitive mindsets. This study concludes that a balanced integration of restorative and retributive approaches is necessary, depending on the nature and severity of the crime. Strengthening the legal framework, enhancing institutional capacity, and promoting a cultural shift within law enforcement are crucial steps toward establishing restorative justice as a legitimate, humane, and sustainable alternative in Indonesia’s criminal justice system.

References

Afifah Denadin, S. (2023). Pelaksanaan penanganan anak melalui proses diversi dalam pembaharuan sistem peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 3(2), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v3i2.19297

Ahmad Fajri Aslam. (2025). Program reintegrasi sosial pada warga binaan pemasyarakatan di Lapas Kelas IIA Serang. Journal Central Publisher, 2(1), 1500–1513. https://doi.org/10.60145/jcp.v2i1.332

Ali, M., & Farhana. (2023). Perlindungan hukum hak asasi manusia terhadap korban unlawful killing dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Reformasi Hukum, 27(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v27i1.601

Arum, S. K. K., & Maulidah, K. (2025). Pembaruan hukum pidana melalui penerapan prinsip insignifikansi: Kajian dalam KUHP baru Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas, 1(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.56607/73krj443

Bakhtiar, Mustaring, Andi Aco Agus, M. Yunasri Ridhoh, & Rahyudi Dwiputra. (2023). Menuju pemulihan dan rekonsiliasi: Menjelajahi prinsip dan manfaat keadilan restoratif. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 50, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v50i1.9885

Djiwa, S., Suwerjo, M., & Zakky, M. (2025). Analisis yuridis pertimbangan hukum dalam putusan perkara pembunuhan berencana berdasarkan perspektif keadilan (Studi kasus pembunuhan berencana Ferdy Sambo Putusan Nomor 796/Pid.B/2022/Pn Jkt.Sel.). Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie, 7(1), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v6i2.177

Dwi Elsa, N., Sulatri, K., & Ariesta, W. (2025). Penerapan restorative justice sebagai alternatif penyelesaian perkara terhadap anak pelaku tindak pidana kekerasan fisik. Juris Delict Journal, 1(2), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.52429/2xkkf655

Elfin, F. H., & Fahmiron. (2025). Tanggung jawab hukum pelaku kecelakaan lalu lintas untuk merehabilitasi korban berdasarkan keadilan restoratif. Ekasakti Legal Science Journal, 2(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.60034/qb93m931

Filda Evangelista Nababan, Polin Prodigy Sirait, & Michael Rio Hamonangan Manalu. (2023). Perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh penguasa di era digital. YUSTISI, 10(1), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v10i1.17255

Hariyadi, N. S., Suherman, A. M., & Setiady, T. (2025). Teori hukum pidana: Pemidanaan, korupsi, dan perlindungan anak di Indonesia. Action Research Literate, 9(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.46799/arl.v9i1.2602

Irma, A., & Putranto, R. D. (2025). Perlindungan hukum anak sebagai saksi dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. FOCUS, 6(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.37010/fcs.v6i1.1840

Iskandar, I., Maswain, G., & Halim, A. (2024). Penegakan hukum oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Bandung berdasarkan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 152–172. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v4i1.3260

Khumaeroh Azzahro, & Putri Setianingsih. (2025). Dinamika penegakan hukum di Indonesia: Tantangan dan solusi. Journal Central Publisher, 1(12), 1348–1354. https://doi.org/10.60145/jcp.v1i12.308

Putra, N. I. G., Hafrida, H., & Erwin, E. (2025). Penegakan hukum pidana Pasal 252 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 dalam perspektif kepastian hukum. Journal of Law, Education and Business, 3(1), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v3i1.5682

Rahmadani, A. P., & Amaliyah, Y. (2024). Nilai sosial dan sikap gotong royong dalam tradisi Umbung Kutei pada masyarakat suku Rejang di Kabupaten Kepahiang. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v7i3.91491

Rante Ubleeuw, A. G. (2022). Komparasi pendekatan restorative justice dalam penanganan perkara pidana antara kepolisian dan kejaksaan. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 10(2), 291. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v10i2.64717

Sari, R. T. M., Fitriyani, F., & Anggreni. Sy, D. (2023). Penerapan prinsip-prinsip pendekatan restorative justice oleh jaksa penuntut umum dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana umum di wilayah hukum Kejaksaan Tinggi Bengkulu. LAJOUR (Law Journal), 4(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.32767/lajour.v4i1.185

Septia, G. K., & Suhartini, S. (2024). Kepentingan restitusi dalam sistem peradilan pidana sebagai sarana pemulihan korban kekerasan seksual. JURNAL SYNTAX IMPERATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 4(6), 916–928. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-imperatif.v4i6.334

Taufan, U., Alam, A. S., & Chaidar, M. (2023). Pengaturan restorative justice terhadap pelaku dan korban dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana anak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra, 1(2), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.38156/jihwp.v1i2.143

Yulianto, T. (2023). Keadilan restoratif (restorative justice) sebagai alternatif penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana. Orbith: Majalah Ilmiah Pengembangan Rekayasa dan Sosial, 19(2), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.32497/orbith.v19i2.4999

Downloads

Published

2025-09-12

How to Cite

Sitti Munawwarah, Tumian Lian Daya Purba, Kaharuddin Syah, Irsyad Sudirman, & Muhammad Aiman. (2025). Perbandingan Pendekatan Pidana Restoratif dan Retributif dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Kejahatan di Indonesia secara Hukum dan Sosial. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 5(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i4.7626