Transformasi Paradigma Kebijakan Publik: Integrasi Prinsip Hukum Progresif dalam Pembangunan Hukum Responsif di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i2.6298Keywords:
Progressive Law, Responsive Law, Public Policy, Paradigm TransformationAbstract
This article discusses the transformation of the public policy paradigm in Indonesia through the integration of progressive legal principles in order to realize legal development that is responsive to the social needs of society. Progressive law, as initiated by Satjipto Rahardjo, emphasizes that the law must side with substantive justice and the needs of the people, not merely enforce rigid and procedural legal certainty. This research uses a normative juridical approach with qualitative analysis of various laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant case studies. The results of the study show that the integration of progressive legal principles into public policy has great potential in bridging the gap between social reality and formalistic legal construction. However, the implementation of this principle is faced with a number of challenges, such as institutional resistance from conservative legal institutions, a legal education paradigm that is still legal-formalistic, and limited public participation in the legislative process. To overcome these obstacles, a comprehensive strategy is needed, including reforming the legal education curriculum, revitalizing law enforcement officials, strengthening the role of civil society, and optimizing information technology in the justice system. With these steps, legal transformation is expected to be not only structural, but also cultural and paradigmatic, so as to realize a national legal system that is more inclusive, fair, and relevant to the dynamics of contemporary Indonesian society.
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Chazawi, A., & Ferdian, A. (2011). Tindak pidana informasi & transaksi elektronik: Penyerangan terhadap kepentingan hukum pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan transaksi elektronik. Malang: Bayumedia.
Dewantara, R. (2014). Rekonseptualisasi asas demokrasi ekonomi dalam konstitusi Indonesia. Arena Hukum, 7(2), 195–209.
Dewantara, R. (2014). Rekonseptualisasi asas demokrasi ekonomi dalam konstitusi Indonesia. Arena Hukum, 7(3), 195–213.
Elta, Y. H., & Yoserwan. (2023, September). Paradigma critical legal studies terhadap asas legalitas di dalam sistem hukum pidana di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 2507–2518.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fuady, M. (2003). Aliran hukum kritis (Paradigma ketidakberdayaan hukum). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hadjon, P. M. (2010). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Harkrisnowo, H. (2013). Reformasi pendidikan hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(1), 15–29.
Indonesia. (2012). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012.
Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa.
Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas.
Kennedy, D. (1982). Legal education and the reproduction of hierarchy. Journal of Legal Education, 32(4), 591–615.
Kristiana, Y. (2006). Rekonstruksi birokrasi kejaksaan dengan pendekatan hukum progresif, studi penyelidikan, penyidikan, dan penuntutan tindak pidana korupsi (Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro).
Latif, Y. (2020). Negara paripurna: Historisitas, rasionalitas, dan aktualitas Pancasila. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Manan, B. (1992). Dasar-dasar perundang-undangan Indonesia. Jakarta: Ind-Hill-Company.
Marzali, A. (2012). Antropologi dan kebijakan publik. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. New York: Harper & Row.
Nugroho, S. S. (2019). Sukma hukum keadilan berhati nurani. Sidoarjo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
Rahardjo, S. (2005). Hukum progresif: Hukum yang membebaskan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 1(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.1.1.1-24
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif: Sebuah sintesa hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Rais, S. H., Gaffar, A., & Rasyid, R. (2005). Otonomi daerah dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Syamsuddin, M. (2012). Konstruksi baru budaya hukum hakim berbasis hukum progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Wahab, S. A. (2008). Analisis kebijaksanaan: Dari formulasi ke implementasi kebijaksanaan negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wisnubroto, A., & Widiartana, G. (2021). Menuju hukum acara pidana baru. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
