Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menentukan Besar Sudut pada Bangun Datar

Authors

  • Brilyant Alvindo Sihombing Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Fithrah Amalia Sirait Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Devita Syahputri Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Dinda Rizky Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Siti Aisyah Lubis Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Novitasari Br Hutauruk Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Muhammad Amin Fauzi Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i1.5706

Keywords:

error analysis, angle size, flat shapes, mathematics education students

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the types of student errors in solving problems on determining the size of angles in flat shapes. The subjects of the study were students of the Mathematics Education Study Program, State University of Medan, academic year 2024/2025. Data were obtained through written tests and interviews with 10 students. The results of the study showed that the errors often made by students included conceptual errors (42%), procedural errors (38%), and computational errors (20%). Conceptual errors are mainly related to understanding the relationship between angles in triangles and supplementary angles, procedural errors are related to unsystematic solution steps, while computational errors are errors in making calculations. This study provides recommendations to improve students' conceptual understanding of angles and their relationships in flat shapes.

References

Abdussakir. (2012). Pembelajaran Geometri Sesuai Teori Van Hiele. Madrasah, 2(1), 1-12.

Biber, C., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The mistakes and the misconceptions of the eighth grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 50-59.

Hidayat, W., & Iksan, Z. H. (2015). The effect of realistic mathematics education on students' conceptual understanding of linear programming. Creative Education, 6(22), 2438-2445.

Khanifah, N. M., & Nusantara, T. (2013). Analisis kesalahan penyelesaian soal prosedural bentuk pangkat bulat dan scaffoldingnya. Jurnal Online Universitas Negeri Malang, 1(3), 1-8.

Krismanto, A. (2016). Beberapa Teknik, Model, dan Strategi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: PPPG Matematika.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Newman, M. A. (1977). An analysis of sixth-grade pupils' errors on written mathematical tasks. Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin, 39, 31-43.

Özerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh grade students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 720-729.

Siswandi, E., & Sujadi, I. (2016). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika kontekstual pada materi segiempat berdasarkan analisis Newman ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(7), 633-643.

Sukirman. (2005). Identifikasi Kesalahan-kesalahan yang Diperbuat Siswa Kelas III SMP pada Setiap Aspek Penguasaan Bahan Pelajaran Matematika. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-28

How to Cite

Brilyant Alvindo Sihombing, Fithrah Amalia Sirait, Devita Syahputri, Dinda Rizky, Siti Aisyah Lubis, Novitasari Br Hutauruk, & Muhammad Amin Fauzi. (2025). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menentukan Besar Sudut pada Bangun Datar. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 5(1), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i1.5706

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Maret : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.