Analisis Kasus Pencurian Menurut Pasal 362 KUHP Dan Hadist Bukhari No. 6285
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v4i2.3577Keywords:
Theft, Article 362 of the Criminal Code, Hadith Bukhari no.6285Abstract
This research aims to analyze cases of theft based on Article 362 of the Criminal Code and Hadith Bukhari no. 6285. The research method used is qualitative with case studies. Data was collected through literature studies and analysis of court decisions related to theft cases. The research results show that Article 362 of the Criminal Code and Hadith Bukhari no. 6285 has similarities and differences in defining and regulating the crime of theft. The similarities lie in the elements of theft, namely taking something that does not belong to you with the intention of possessing it. The difference lies in the sanctions given, where the Criminal Code provides for imprisonment, while Hadith Bukhari no. 6285 sanctions caning. It can be concluded from this research that Article 362 of the Criminal Code and Hadith Bukhari no. 6285 are two different sources of law in regulating the crime of theft. Even though they have similarities and differences, these two sources of law have the same goal, namely to protect property rights and uphold justice.
References
Ahmad Wardi Mushlih, Pengantar Dan Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana Islam, Fiqih Jinayah, Cet.2, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006.
Andi Zainal Abidin, 2007, Hukum Pidana 1, Cetakan Kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, Hal. 47
Bambang Sunggono,2011.“Metodologi Penelitian Hukum”, Pt.Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.Hal 109
Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan,
Djazuli. A, Fiqih Jinayah, Upaya Menanggulangi Kejahatan Dalam Islam, Cet.3, Pt. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2000.
H. M. Federspiel, Tajul Arifin, Dan R.T. Hidayat. Kajian Al-Qur'an Di Indonesia: Dari Mahmud Yumus Hingga Quraish Shihab (Bandung: Mizan, 1996).
Hasballah Thaib. M Dan Imam Jauhari, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana Islam, Pustaka Bangsa Press, Medan, 2004. Mohch Anwar, Beberapa Ketentuan Umum Dalam Buku I Kuhp, Cet. 2, Alumni, Bandung, 1997.
Hasballah Thaib. M Dan Imam Jauhari, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana Islam Pustaka Bangsa Press, Medan, 2004, Hlm. 28-29
I Gusti Ayu Jatiana Manik Wedanti, A.A. Ketut Sukranatha, Unsur Melawan Hukum Dalam Pasal 362 Kuhp Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencurian
Mahrus Ali, 2011, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika: Jakarta, Hal.98
Moeljatno, 1958, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Kuhp), Pt. Bina Aksara, Jakarta
Moeljatno,2008, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Kedelapan, Edisi Revisi, Rineka Cipta,Jakarta, Hal.59
Niniek Suparni, Eksistensi Pidana Denda Dalam Sistem Pidana Dan Pemidanaan, Cet.2, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2007.
Peraturan Uu Kuhp No. 362 Kuhp
Prasetyo, Teguh, 2010, Hukum Pidana, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Rusmiati, Syahrizal, Mohd. Din, Konsep Pencurian Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, Vol. 1(1) April 2017, Pp. 339-352
Soesilo. R, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana, Peraturan Umum Dan Delik-Delik Khusus, Politeia, Bogor, 1998
Tajul Arifin. Antropologi Hukum Islam (Bandung: Pusat Penelitian Dan Penerbitan Uin Sunan Gunung Djati, 2016)
Tajul Arifin. Ulumul Hadits (Bandung: Sunan Gunung Djati Press, 2014).
Tongat, 2008, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan. Umm Press, Malang. Universitas Dipomnegoro. Semarang, 2001, Hlm. 77-78 Https://Ilmuislam.Id/Hadits/14676/Hadits-Bukhari-Nomor-6285 Diakses 13 April 2024 Puku
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
