Dinamika Eksekusi Putusan Hakim Pasca Peninjauan Kembali dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Hak Terpidana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i4.10342Keywords:
KUHAP, Legal Certainty, Protection of Human Rights, State Responsibility, The Constitutional CourtAbstract
The implementation of the execution of judges' decisions after the Review (PK) raises a dilemma between legal certainty and the protection of the human rights of convicts. On the one hand, the execution of decisions that have had legal force is still necessary to maintain judicial authority and legal consistency. However, on the other hand, the PK as an extraordinary legal remedy opens up room for correction to potentially erroneous decisions, so that the execution cannot be carried out in a hurry. This research uses a normative-sociological approach by examining the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the Constitutional Court Decision, and the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 7 of 2014, accompanied by an analysis of the practices of law enforcement officials. The results of the study show the need for regulatory synchronization and institutional reform so that post-PK executions reflect a balance between legal certainty, substantive justice, and the state's responsibility to protect the rights of convicts. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of harmonization between legal norms and judicial practice to ensure that the execution of judgments not only upholds legal certainty, but also guarantees the protection of human rights.
References
Al Farizi, D. (2016). Hak terpidana setelah masa penahanan atas putusan pidana bersyarat. Lentera Hukum, 3(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v3i2.16878
Barcelona Hariandja, R. (2024). Upaya hukum luar biasa peninjauan kembali perkara pidana dalam perspektif kepastian hukum (Tesis). Universitas Jambi.
Harahap, M. Y. (2019). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan sidang pengadilan, banding, kasasi, dan peninjauan kembali. Sinar Grafika.
Haryadi, P. (2022). Penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan melalui gugatan perdata. Sinar Grafika.
Kadafi, B. (2023). Peninjauan kembali: Koreksi kesalahan dalam putusan. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2023). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XXI/2023. Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2020). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Alumni.
Prasetyo, T. (2018). Hukum pidana. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Putri, N. A., Amin, M. E., & Hafidah, N. (2023). Kedudukan peninjauan kembali jaksa penuntut umum pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 20/PUU-XXI/2023. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Prima, 6(2).
Refani, S. S., & Firmansyah, H. (2024). Kepastian hukum masa tunggu eksekusi terpidana mati dalam tindak pidana narkotika. Journal of Syntax Literate, 9(2), 1132–1145.
Sembiring, A. N. (2024). Kepastian hukum pemilik sertipikat hak milik atas tanah akibat eksekusi putusan pengadilan (Tesis Magister Kenotariatan).
Siregar, R. E. (2022). Kepastian hukum masa tunggu eksekusi pidana mati. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 1(7).
Sudarto. (2017). Hukum dan hukum pidana. Alumni.
Triwati, A., Juita, S. R., & Mulyani, T. (2015). Upaya hukum peninjauan kembali dalam perkara pidana pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 17(2).
Vic, B. J., Rusman, R., Tjhia, K. M., & Maria, I. (2025). Ketidakpastian hukum terhadap penundaan eksekusi pidana mati. Jurnal Retentum, 7(1), 450–462.
Waluyo, B. (2020). Penyelesaian perkara pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Yanuarto, T., Rato, D., & Anggono, B. D. (2023). Putusan nihil ditinjau melalui perspektif teori kepastian hukum. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 4(3), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.55637/jph.4.3.8377.444-453
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
