Implikasi Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Asas Parate Eksekusi dalam Jaminan Fidusia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i4.10220Keywords:
Constitutional Court Decision, Debtor Protection, Due Process Law, Fiduciary Security, Parate ExecutionAbstract
This study analyzes the implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on the application of the parate execution principle in fiduciary security. The research is motivated by the transformation of fiduciary execution, where parate execution can no longer be exercised unilaterally by creditors without debtor consent regarding default or a court decision. This study employs a normative juridical research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to examine changes in the legal meaning and implementation of parate execution after the Constitutional Court’s decision. The findings indicate that the decision does not abolish parate execution but conditions its application on specific procedural requirements, including debtor acknowledgment of default and judicial oversight in the event of disputes. Accordingly, the scope of creditors’ direct execution rights becomes limited, while legal protection for debtors is strengthened through the application of the due process of law principle. The study concludes that the Constitutional Court Decision represents a recalibration of the parate execution principle within fiduciary law rather than its complete elimination.
References
Alifiya, A., & Yunita, Y. (2025). Keabsahan penarikan sepihak objek fidusia oleh debt collector tanpa adanya sertifikat fidusia sebagai bentuk pelaksanaan parate eksekusi. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i4.4111
Alizon, J. (2025). Rekonstruksi pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan fidusia pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/eksekusi/article/view/9741
Badriyah, S. M. (2015). Perlindungan hukum bagi kreditor di dalam penggunaan base transceiver station (BTS) sebagai objek jaminan fidusia di dalam perjanjian kredit. Jurnal Media Hukum, 22(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2015.0056
Bella, D. S., Yahya, T., & Hasan, U. (2025). Pengaturan parate eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Recital Review, 7(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v7i1.39352
Budi, A. (2021). Hapusnya lembaga parate eksekusi sebagai akibat hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(2), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.3053
Fauzan, Diana, N. N., & Amelia, R. (2025). Jenis-jenis hak jaminan di dalam perspektif hukum perdata dan hukum Islam: Studi konseptual. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(9), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15178682
Hardianysah, F. (2022). Pelaksanaan parate eksekusi dalam jaminan fidusia di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS), 1(1), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v1i1.1762
J. Neltje, & Panjiyoga, I. (2023). Nilai-nilai yang tercakup di dalam asas kepastian hukum. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(5), 2034–2039. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/5009
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2019). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative legal research in Indonesia: Its origins and approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855
Pradnyawan, S. W. A., Nurani, S. S., Budiono, A., & Sasongko, S. (2020). Execution of fiduciary collateral based on the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, 1(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i2.3165
Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
Sari, D. N., & Suwondo, D. (2025). Perlindungan hukum bagi debitor terhadap parate eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia (studi kasus di PT BCA Finance Cabang Semarang). Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung, 368–379.
Soekanto, S. (2008). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI Press.
Subekti, R. (1982). Hukum acara perdata. Binacipta.
Suryoutomo, M. (2016). The implementation of parate executie in fiduciary security based on applicable Indonesian laws. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 3(12), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0312007
Yuaga, N. E., & Trihastuti, N. (2025). Jaminan fidusia sebagai jaminan kebendaan yang memberi hak mendahulu di dalam perolehan pelunasan utang. JIHHP, 5(5), 3779–3785. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4725
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
